Yesterday a group of nuns in their 80’s and 90’s were turned away from voting in the primary election in Indiana because their photo ID’s were outdated. To some, this story will read this way:
Elderly nuns are affected by the photo ID laws put into place in order to vote.
To me, it’s a story about the politics of mobility. As in: our society assumes that mobility is on a parity for all of us. It most certainly is not. Mobility for some people with disabilities is dependent on specialized equipment, whether it be a van with a lift or a power chair. Some blind people, for example, rely on mass transit, which may not take them, for example, to a motor vehicle agency to get an updated photo ID. Elderly people are also affected if they cannot drive. Poverty is another issue affecting mobility for those who cannot afford a car.
But, although mobility may look different than jumping in a car and going where we want for large numbers of us, we don’t hear about the politics of mobility. Why? Because a lack of mobility makes a group even less likely to be heard. Those who are poor, housebound and who are not out in their communities do not have access to the usual channels of socializing and networking. In fact, the only people they may come into contact with are family members or caregivers. And, for some, no one.
There’s more involved here for people with disabilities than just not having access to transportation or medical equipment, although that’s a big part of the picture. There’s the fact that even getting a piece of medical equipment fixed takes an extraordinarily long period of time for many people. Ordering wheelchair parts can mean a wait of months unlike getting a car fixed. As insurance denials for specialized equipment increase, the numbers of those who are housebound rise. Have you priced an accessible vehicle or wheelchair? The cost is astronomical and without one, getting to where one needs to go is not a given. Taking public transportation is not just limiting because of where the routes go, but because some would need to bring an attendant along, which is also expensive.
This story about the nuns is easier to write about than the politics of mobility. It’s easier to write about these nuns, say they knew about the requirement and didn’t do it, as if it was an inconvenience, and to add that the convent will help them get the proper ID for November, than it is to write about how many seniors or people with disabilities or poor people don’t have the resources to do that. It’s easier to just leave the politics of mobility out of – well – politics.
But as long as the politics of mobility remains unspoken, those who cannot be mobile will remain isolated and unheard.
Copyright 2008 Ruth Harrigan